Bob Iger’s book is out, and one Redditor already pulled the quotes on Lucas and Star Wars.
The Walt Disney Company seemingly owns everything now, but much of that happened during the reign of CEO Bob Iger, whose new book The Ride of a Lifetime: Lessons Learned from 15 Years as CEO of the Walt Disney Company details his time at the top of the Matterhorn.
Among the most interesting and impactful moments in Iger’s rule was the purchase of Lucasfilm in 2012 for 4 billion dollars. With the purchase came some outlines for the extension and completion of the Star Wars saga, penned by George Lucas himself:
“At some point in the process, George told me that he had completed outlines for three new movies. He agreed to send us three copies of the outlines: one for me; one for Alan Braverman; and one for Alan Horn, who’d just been hired to run our studio. Alan Horn and I read George’s outlines and decided we needed to buy them, though we made clear in the purchase agreement that we would not be contractually obligated to adhere to the plot lines he’d laid out.”
My guests on the show today are a rare breed of twin directors who started by climbing the commercial ladder before a personal project helped to open doors to the feature’s world. They are also extra special for being one of the few repeat guest on the podcast.
In this week’s episode we sit down with Josh and Jonathan Baker to catch up on what has changed since last time we chatted, their first feature experience, and where they’d like to go next.
Patreon Podcast – Arrival of the Darkness
Another great episode over on the Feature Film Breakdowns for Patreon supporters of the show.
This week we look at Bradford Young’s work on Arrival.
Spoiler Alert: It is dark, and it is good. Plus it is easy….the only catch is it is really really difficult.
Make sure to check it out on your podcast app of choice and head over to the Patreon site to see the images and scenes we go over in the episode.
To see the images and listen to the special breakdown podcast click the link below:
The DULENS APO 2/85mm is the first in the series from a new company in China. This is a stills line of lenses with plans to create cine versions down the track. We can’t find too much information on the team behind the lenses but we have been told that it is the same optical … Continued
Paul Thomas Anderson Screenplays Paul Thomas Anderson is considered one of our greatest living writer/directors. His filmography might not be long but if packs a punch. His screenplays are a masterclass in the craft. Take a listen to Paul Thomas Anderson discussing her storytelling techniques. The screenplays below are the only ones that are available…
The Script Template: Understanding the Elements of a Screenplay
What exactly is a script template? Well, just like a novel, poem or newspaper article, a screenplay tells a story. But unlike those other forms of communication and expression, a screenplay is meant to serve as a blueprint for another medium: film. It’s because of this unique relationship that a script template is necessary to convey the different elements of the story.
It’s important to note that Screenwriters have a special advantage when it comes to writing a screenplay: a variety of screenwriting software programs that act instinctively to prompt the script element required next. However, even with this help, it’s still vital that the Screenwriter understands how each element works and how best to tell their story through each one.
The following breakdown of script template elements can provide some guidance as to why each one is necessary and some tips on using them:
Scene headings (aka sluglines)
Scene Headings (aka Sluglines)
A common refrain before telling a story is, “Let me set the scene.” And for good reason! It’s called context. Before an audience can follow along with a story, they need to know where in the world—real or imaginary—it takes place and when it takes place, as subtleties such as day and night can dramatically change how a person processes what they are reading or being told.
Hence, scene headings. Also commonly referred to as sluglines, this script template element, written in capital letters, informs the reader to the where and when of the screenplay. An example of what a slugline might look like is: “AMITY ISLAND BEACH – DAY.” In a succinct manner, we now know exactly where the following scene is taking place and when.
This is also the perfect time to point out that the Screenwriter must create a new scene heading each time the story moves to a different location…
Which brings us to subheaders. Before we go any further, though, it should be mentioned that just as the story of a screenplay is subject to the writer’s stylistic choices, so too are some allowances made for how they use different script template elements. Case in point—the decision to use a subheader versus a new scene heading.
Let’s say that an entire screenplay takes place in one location, such as a house. It could become tedious, as well as unnecessary, to have a new scene heading each time a character moves from one room to another. In this case, it would be entirely appropriate to use subheaders such as “BEDROOM” or “KITCHEN” instead. However, if a screenplay takes place in multiple locations, the character’s home being only one of them, it would make more sense to use a new scene heading for each distinct setting.
When it comes to what readers typically like to see in a script, some common words of advice include “keep a lot of white on the page” and “make sure they’re reading vertically, not horizontally.” Both point to keeping action lines short.
Typically what immediately follows a scene heading is the action line. As its name indicates, this script template element is used to describe what is happening within the scene. Continuing with the scene heading example above, an action line might read something like this: “Police Chief Brody scans the water for danger as the beachgoers enjoy themselves in it.”
What should be kept in mind when writing action lines is to keep them as concise as possible. Remember, a screenplay is not meant to be read like a novel. Long paragraphs can not only slow down a reader but also discourage them from finishing the script. The decision to give up on a script for this exact reason is common for Managers, Agents and executives who have little time to determine if they like a script, as they have dozens more waiting for them.
If a particular scene demands more than an average description, like a car chase or war battle, conventional advice recommends that the Writer break up the action lines as much as possible to keep it reader-friendly. When it comes to what readers typically like to see in a script, some common words of advice include “keep a lot of white on the page” and “make sure they’re reading vertically, not horizontally.” Both point to keeping action lines short.
Says Screenwriter Nadia Madden, “Less is more. Each chunk—this can even be only one line or word—of scene direction is like a camera angle. No more than four lines of action at a time, but even that can be a lot. Each word needs to be economical and important or it shouldn’t be there.”
Dialogue sounds pretty straightforward, right? Well, what if character names were suddenly no longer allowed? Would dialogue still seem like such an easy task? While this is a hypothetical that likely would never be asked for, Writers should look to this question as a bar for whether they’re making each character’s dialogue distinct. Because that’s really what the question is asking… Can the dialogue alone clue in the reader to who is saying what?
While each Writer should have a unique voice that comes through in their work, so too should each character in their screenplay have a unique voice that differentiates them from every other character. If that’s not happening, it might be time to revisit the script.
A script template element that might be seen alongside a character’s name is an extension. Extensions are used to indicate that what we’re reading as dialogue is more than just words being spoken by that character on-screen.
For instance, if there’s a “V.O.” in parentheses next to a name, it’s notifying the reader that the dialogue is, in fact, a voiceover. A voiceover may or may not be a character’s way of breaking the fourth wall and directly communicating with the audience. Sometimes a voiceover is merely an internal voicing of a character’s thoughts. But in either case, a voiceover is heard and not seen.
Another common extension is “O.S.” If placed in parentheses next to a character’s name, it means that the character is voicing their dialogue, but it’s off-screen. This type of extension in many ways serves as an implicit camera direction to the filmmakers of the script, as it’s indicating that while the character is saying those words in the scene, they shouldn’t be shown on-screen in that particular moment.
Parentheticals are another script template element that can be used in conjunction with dialogue. Essentially, parentheticals help to explain to the reader—and eventual Actor voicing the dialogue—how it should be read.
But here’s the thing. In the vast majority of cases, the dialogue itself should be strong enough to indicate how it should be read. Therefore, parentheticals should never be used as a crutch as an added explanation of the dialogue. Screenwriter Owen Croak notes, “I err towards the economical, trying not to overuse them and also using them in places where they convey information more efficiently than action lines or breaking up dialogue into smaller fragments.”
Another note to keep in mind regarding parentheticals: while it’s the Writer’s prerogative to have a preference for how a line should be said, ultimately it’s the Director and Actor who will be making the call. Too many parentheticals in a script can be stifling to the creativity of these individuals, or worse, it might turn off a Director or Actor entirely to being part of the project.
The use of transitions in a script template can be yet another hot-button topic. But first, what are they? Well, they’re somewhat self-explanatory. Transitions are elements that can help a Writer move from one scene to the next. Probably the most common transition is “CUT TO.” Other transitions include “INTERCUT,” “SMASH TO” and “DISSOLVE TO.”
But as they indicate, transitions largely point towards a type of edit. And much like parentheticals, they can easily be overused and/or impose on the authority and creativity of the Editor. For his work, Screenwriter Dustin Fleischmann states, “I tend to avoid typing out transitions to let the Editors come up with natural transitions in the cutting room. Plus, it’s a space saver: It’s implied that you’re cutting to another shot when a new scene heading that takes places in an entirely new location immediately follows the end of the previous scene.”
There was a time when transitions were used more commonly. But now much can be read between the lines in screenplays. As Fleischmann mentions, as a script moves from one scene heading to the next, the assumption is that a simple cut will enable that action. Therefore, “CUT TO” is not necessary.
While each Writer should have a unique voice that comes through in their work, so too should each character in their screenplay have a unique voice that differentiates them from every other character. If that’s not happening, it might be time to revisit the script.
While many screenwriting experts would advise using caution with transitions, the only two of these elements that are still used with little reservation are “FADE IN” and “FADE OUT.” Whether just an industry-wide tradition or not, these elements that indicate the beginning and end of a script are still widely the norm in script formatting.
Much like learning French or Mandarin, the script template has a language all its own. And to become a successful Screenwriter, it’s important to become a master of that language. As Fleischmann notes, “Know the rules before you break them… If you don’t know the rules and you try to break them, it’s noticeable—and makes you look like an amateur.”
Screenplay software has made it easier than ever to write a script, and while the elements explained above constitute those most commonly used, every Screenwriter should become familiar with the greater intricacies of script template formatting through their preferred software. But in the end, it always comes back to the Screenwriter being able to discern how best to implement those elements. As with that knowledge comes the confidence and agility to craft a script that will garner the attention of those in a position to make it.
Why “Downton Abbey” was crushing “Rambo” and Brad Pitt at the box office, we talked to its director about the movie, his career, and his process.
There is simply no other way to put it: Michael Engler has directed a ton of great stuff. In this golden age of TV, he has helmed many episodes of many of the great shows. I repeat it when we spoke because it bears repeating. From Deadwood to Sex and the City, Michael has steered many a ship to success.
A photographer has been killed during a senior photoshoot after a falling tree branch hit her. Local authorities have announced that they are treating the incident as suspicious and have since offered a $10,000 reward for anyone that can help with their investigation.
Films and video games have been moving closer together for years now, including open world games that mimic cinematic storytelling and videos that include viewer input in the style of a choose-your-own-adventure novel. The mechanics of the latter have often been intrusive, however, making viewers click a link or—with the recent flowering of virtual reality—direct their gaze at an icon indicating their narrative selection. While this can result in compelling products, like the 2017 VR film Broken Night, many filmmakers in the space miss the immersion of a traditional film and want to mask the more game-like control mechanics in […]
Camera sensors are incredibly complex pieces of engineering prowess, bringing together mankind’s attempt to replicate the behavior of the human eye in perceiving light, but there are still many limitations. Cameras are rarely good at capturing decent photographs of rainbows, but some cameras are significantly worse than others, thanks to a strange quirk of science.
Adobe recently released the September update for its Camera Raw plugin, the software that enables users to import and edit Raw images in the company’s creative software applications like Photoshop and Bridge.
Camera Raw version 11.4.1 adds support for four additional camera models: Fujifilm X-A7, Sony A7R IV (ILCE-7RM4), Panasonic Lumix DC-S1H, and the Sony RX100 VII (DSC-RX100M7). The new camera support is also available in Lightroom and Lightroom Classic starting with versions 2.4.1 and 8.4.1, respectively.
With the updated support, users can edit RAF images from the Fujifilm X-A7, as well as RW2 files from the Lumix DC-S1H and ARW files from the two newly added Sony cameras. Adobe Camera Raw 11.4.1 is available to download for Windows and macOS for free from Adobe’s website. The Lightroom and Lightroom Classic updates should be available through Adobe’s Creative Cloud desktop app.
California company Rock Bar has introduced a much tidier solution to weighing down tripods and light stands with a new weight case that straps securely to legs and center columns to provide extra stability.
The Rock Bar system comprises a nylon zip-up tube that comes filled with seven pounds of recycled steel and which uses straps at either end of its body to attach to legs without swaying in windy conditions.
The number of weights in the body can be adjusted by the user depending on the conditions and the equipment being supported, and the slim-line pouch is designed not to get in the way or to catch the wind itself. Rock Bar is aimed at tripod users, and those hanging lights on high stands and boom arms, and is intended to replace sandbags and other types of hanging ballast.
The case measures 31.75×6.35×6.98cm (12.5×2.5×2.75in) and costs $45. For more information see the Rock Bar website.
Learning any new photography software can be challenging and time consuming. Even when we learn enough to do basic image edits, we often overlook tools that would speed up our process or give us better results. That’s why we teamed up with Quentin Decaillet to produce The Complete Capture One Editing Guide.
This is an open letter to your company regarding the increasingly poor treatment of media and credentialed photographers.
I have been shooting concerts for approaching 10 years now, and I have watched the change and decline in how media and photo passes are handled for concerts over the years, so I want to outline this change and explain the extremely frustrating situation I recently experienced at one of your venues.
Let’s rewind to 2010 when I was first getting started with shooting. When you got credentialed for shows, you picked up your tickets and/or photo passes from a box office, went in, shot your three songs, then you kept your gear on you and could shoot from the crowd for the rest of the show. Bear in mind that to this day this is how most other venues still operate (except when bands specify otherwise).
Sometime in 2013-2014, this changed a little bit. Media escorts suddenly came into the picture. After we picked up our credentials, these escorts had to fetch us from the gates and take us to a media area, and we were only allowed access to the photo pit when they led us there. Between sets, we became confined to the media area, and I’ve even had experiences where I wasn’t allowed to go to my seat when I had a review ticket.
After around 2015, this review ticketing issue got sorted out when you all decided to let photographers risk leaving their expensive gear (we’re talking anywhere between $1k and $20k here, maybe even more for some) in the media area, sometimes completely unattended.
But then in 2017 or so, things got really put on lockdown. Often times, credentials stopped being left at the box office and you had to meet up with a media escort to even receive your pass or ticket (don’t even get me started on how difficult and frequent it is that you have to argue with security at the gates to convince them that you’re trying to get in in order to receive your credentials). Then they started making you sign a waiver about the expensive gear you leave behind between sets, freeing the company from liability… even though media is supposed to be reviewing the show.
Also, you stopped wanting people to get credentialing through a band directly and started making media go through your venue’s personal contact or contact forms (essentially adding a middle man to an already complicated process).
Now, in 2018-2019, things have started getting even more challenging. After 10 years of shooting, you have to understand that people network and make connections in the industry. When bands know a photographer and trust their work, it is much easier to get in touch with the band members directly and receive credentialing through them, without necessarily needing a publication or having to go through a publicist.
Herein lies the problem, ONLY at Live Nation venues.
For some reason unbeknownst to me, when a photographer receives credentials through a band member directly, these credentials go to the box office and the photographer’s name doesn’t make it to the media list that the media escorts keep. Now, the first time this happened to me, the media escorts were confused by the situation but they managed to make a few radio calls, find a tour manager and get the situation sorted out. The second time it happened, I missed shooting an opening act while the media escorts tried to figure it out, and I almost missed shooting the band that I had been approved for. Now we’re on the third instance of this happening at this particular venue (and at least the sixth instance total including other Live Nation run venues), and this is what happened last night, which I’m going to explain, in all of its frustrating glory.
Note: I am not naming bands, nor band members, in an attempt at some privacy and due to the fact that it has nothing at all to do with the bands themselves and everything to do with Live Nation.
A few days ago, I was texting my band friend—someone that I practically toured with in 2015, to ask about credentialing for a show that took place last night. He was more than happy to get me set up, as well as my fiancé, who is also a photographer. My fiancé decided to email the headlining band to reach out for approval, which he got. I didn’t mind not shooting the headliner and didn’t reach out, so I was content knowing that I wasn’t likely going to get to shoot them. Instead, I emailed the media contacts for the Live Nation venue, knowing that I’ve run into issues before when I go through band members and wanting to get them resolved ahead of time.
I got no response from the Live Nation reps, so I figured either all was fine or that they hadn’t seen it and I’d just have to deal with it and get it sorted at the venue.
So we get there about an hour ahead of time. As I figured, my credentials were at the box office (that’s where they go rather than to the media escort when they’re through a band member). Picked those up no problem. Walk around to the media entrance (on the opposite of the building…). Immediately security says we have the wrong passes, as they are “guest” passes instead of photo passes. Now is where it starts to get fun.
My fiancé’s name is on the media list, since he ended up getting approved through the headlining act. My name is not, as I completely expected it not to be, because that’s the way it always happens at these silly, confused, Live Nation venues. When the media escort comes out to take my fiancé back, she refuses to take me and instead radios to someone else and says,
“That girl who emailed us is here.”
This was the first point of frustration. I now knew they had received my email and knowingly sent me no reply one way or another as to whether there were issues or not. Had they simply taken the time to reply and let me know something wasn’t right on their end, I would’ve had time to get the entire situation sorted and resolved before I ever arrived. Now it was about 30 minutes before showtime and I was stuck standing outside arguing with a less-than-helpful media escort that kept repeating she was just “doing her job,” but making zero effort to get in touch with a tour manager or anyone else that could actually help the situation.
Suddenly realizing that I’ve wasted 15 minutes getting nowhere with her and time was running short, I told her I was done arguing. My gear ended up going in with my fiancé, since I wasn’t allowed to take it in, but he was. I texted my band contact, but with 15 minutes before showtime, I knew I wasn’t likely to get a response.
So I walk back around to the other side of the building again, to go through the normal fan entrance. Then I get down to the floor, show security my pass, with which it turns out I have backstage access. I’m thinking to myself, “Great! Now I have a chance of running into one of the guys who can get this sorted!” Wrong. Instead I get to another security guard who asks to see my credentials and asks how I got back there and where I’m going and what I’m doing. I try to explain the situation, which results in him attempting to lead me to the media area.
On the way over there, he’s radioing media, who then respond that they’ve already turned me away three times (I’ll go ahead and ignore the fact that I’d only argued with her once at this point, not thrice). So now the security guard is irritated with me and basically tells me I’ve been told no, so to go away. I said, “Look, I have a floor ticket and a guest pass, can I at least get to the floor to watch the show?” After scrutinizing my ticket as if I was lying, he finally let me out onto the floor. I returned to the security guard who let me backstage the first time with my guest pass, and waited by the photo pit, defeated and without my gear with two minutes to go until showtime.
Well, the photographers arrive with the media escort who sees me there and is clearly annoyed by my presence so comes to tell me I can’t be there. I show her my guest pass, which is how I got there in the first place, and she argues over that too and tells me I can’t stand back/side stage with that either. At this point, I’d just given up—the band was already on stage, I’m in tears, I was done arguing, so I left the area and went back to the floor.
A few minutes later, a guy tapped me on the shoulder and asked what was going on, apparently he’d overheard my conversation with the media escort. I explained, showed him my texts with the band member, he brought me backstage again and told me to hang tight while he got in touch with the other band’s tour manager. After a few minutes, he came back with an actual photo pass, handed it to me and told the media escort to let me in, even though we were on the last half of the third song.
He is the only person that treated me with kindness at the venue tonight, and he did not work for the venue, was just another tour manager on the road that I’m extremely appreciative of.
My fiancé had kindly brought one extra camera into the photo pit for me just in case we managed to get things sorted out, so he passed the camera over to me and just as I thought everything was good to go, I get blocked off from crossing the right half of the photo pit. What the hell? The band member that got me in at all plays on that side of the stage, and after all that trouble now I can’t even get over to his side to get a decent shot of him?!
After shooting, I got in touch with the band and explained what had happened and why I won’t be providing them very many photos tonight. Needless to say, they were very understanding, but had just as much of a, “WTF?” response as I did.
He proceeded to ask, “Were you at least able to get some shots from the crowd?” I had to explain to him, “No, Live Nation venues don’t allow crowd shooting at all unless the band specifically states it’s okay.” This came as surprise #1 to him. Surprise #2 was hearing about the half-blocked photo pit and learning that he wouldn’t be seeing any shots of himself from the night, as that was another thing he was completely unaware of.
Look, Live Nation. I get that you all want to make sure your guest performers and bands are treated well and that people with fake credentials aren’t sneaking in, but this situation was borderline abusive to me: someone who had genuine and legitimate credentialing through a band member, which should trump any other type of pass.
I don’t know what communication gap exists between band members and Live Nation media representatives, but there is a clear gap and plenty of room for improvement in terms of how that type of situation is handled. Note, this isn’t just me. I have a rather large network of concert photographer friends, many of whom have encountered eerily similar situations when being approved directly by a band member. I thought I was doing your reps a favor by letting them know about the atypical approval situation in advance, but they didn’t even give me the courtesy of a response email.
Also, seriously, what is with the crowd shot restrictions? Do you realize Live Nation venues are the only ones that don’t allow crowd shooting? Did you miss this infamous tweet from Atilla vocalist Chris Fronzak last year?
You have no idea how many times we get 100’s of photos that we will never use or post. Bands want dope crowd shots, not photos of their lower neck 😂 Especially when it’s a massive soldout show, SNAP CROWD PHOTOS PLEASE 🙌🏼
If a band specifically requests the limitation, then I get it. 100% understand. But it doesn’t sound like half the bands that come through your venues are even aware that there is a limitation on crowd shooting for approved photographers.
And if you’re going to close off half a photo pit for a video cameraman, it better be a guy recording the whole damn show to sell official copies, and he better be working directly for the band, not for your venue. Nobody takes up that much of a photo pit, and if he demands access be closed off, then you have hired a self-righteous, pompous, absorbed a**hole, and you should reevaluate your choice of hire. There are plenty of talented people who can do their job in a photo pit kindly, without getting in the way of others, and without needing their “personal space.”
I’ve been patient with your venues for six years now, but every time I return to one, something a little worse seems to happen. Last night was utmost disrespect toward me, and this is where I’m drawing a line and sharing my experience. As one person, I don’t think I can make your venues change, but I think there are enough other photographers out there with similar Live Nation “horror” stories that maybe, if all of us share our experiences, you’ll actually hear us out and want to start treating photographers/media with a little respect again.
Most of us are there to do a job, too, after all.
It’s worth mentioning that not all Live Nation venues are this badly run in the media department. I have had positive experiences with media reps at other venues (@Mari M. at MidFlorida and @Tanya B. at Amway, you’re wonderful; @Fillmore NC, you’re still my favorite AND you’re Live Nation run!), though there is not much consistency from place to place in how everything is handled. This was by and far the worst venue/credentialing experience I have ever had—with over 500 shows in nearly 10 years, that should be saying something.
So, on behalf of all photographers that have had to go through these inconsistent, unpredictable and often miserable situations at your venues, thanks for at least reading through and taking this letter into consideration. We are hopeful for and look forward to future improvements.
Lizzy Davis (+ anyone who wants to add their name below)
About the author: Lizzy Davis is a rainbow-haired metal music and rock photographer based in North Carolina. You can find more of her work on her website, or by following her on Instagram and Facebook. This letter was also published here, and is being republished with permission.
Z CAM E2 flagship cameras will be shipping next month. The S6 (6K super 35), F6 (6K full frame), and F8 (8K full frame) will come in EF-mount and PL-mount versions (user interchangeable). All versions will support the optional electronic ND filter unit. Z CAM E2 S6 will additionally come in M4/3 mount version without the electronic ND filter support.
Z CAM E2 Flagship Cameras will support optional electronic ND filter. Image Credit: cinema5D
Z CAM is a Chinese camera manufacturer. The company has already attracted many customers because of their Z CAM E2 camera, which offered 4K 120fps video recording with M4/3 sensor and internal ProRes or ZRAW recording. Make sure to check our Z CAM E2 review if you haven’t already. Now, the Chinese company is fully focusing on their flagship cameras with larger sensors.
Z CAM first showed prototypes of their new super 35 and full frame cameras during NAB 2019. You can take a look at our NAB article with a video interview from April if you feel like refreshing your memory. We met with Kinson Loo from Z CAM again during IBC in Amsterdam to talk about new development around Z CAM’s new flagship cameras as they are getting close to the shipment date.
Z CAM S6, F6, and F8 Flagship Cameras
Z CAM product names might seem a bit confusing at first, but they actually make sense. S stands for “super 35”, F stands for “full frame”, 6 stands for 6K video recording and 8 stands for 8K recording. At IBC we looked mainly at the Z CAM F6 (full frame image sensor capable of recording video in up to 6K resolution.)
Z CAM E2 Flagship Cameras will ship soon. Image Credit: cinema5D
Kinson explained to us, that what Z CAM showed during NAB in April was not the final form factor of the camera yet. The body will use Sony NP-F batteries. One slight change at the back of the camera is a new 12V two-pin Lemo power output, so some accessories can be powered directly from the camera’s NP-F battery.
New 12V output connector at the back of Z CAM E2 F6 camera. Image Credit: cinema5D
The body of the Z CAM E2 F6 is only around 100g heavier than the original Z CAM E2 so the body itself is still very compact. All Z CAM flagship cameras will be available with two lens mounts – Canon EF-mount and PL-mount. Both mounts will be used interchangeably. Z CAM E2 S6 will additionally come with Micro four thirds mount.
When it comes to internal video recording, all cameras will top at the following recording modes:
Z CAM E2 S6 will record up to 6K 75fps with 14 stops of dynamic range and 300Mbps bitrate.
Z CAM E2 F6 will record up to 6K 60fps with 15 stops of dynamic range and 300Mbps bitrate.
Z CAM E2 F6 will record up to 8K 30fps with 14 stops of dynamic range and 300Mbps bitrate.
All recorded internally to CFast 2.0 media. The cameras support ZRAW format, MOV and MP4 using H.265 for 10-bit recording or H.264 for 8-bit recording. (Interested in reading our thoughts about Z CAM’s ZRAW? Please head to our comparison article by clicking here).
Optional Electronic ND Filter Unit
One of the most exciting new features of this camera’s final version is the optional electronic ND filter. It functions in the same way as the ND RF-EF Adapter from Canon. There is a removable piece, which slides in or out from the side. The piece that comes with the camera contains a pure glass element. The optional unit will contain an electronic ND filter, so limiting the light entering the sensor will be very convenient.
Optional electronic ND filter unit for Z CAM E2 flagship cameras. Image Credit: cinema5D
It seems Z CAM’s electronic ND filter unit will offer a strong range of 1.8 to 8 stops. The advantage of electronic ND is much more precise control over its strength – the strength changes seamlessly, so the exposure can be consistent even when the light is changing (for instance with clouds during outdoor shoots). The ND filter unit will be held in position by two screws.
This electronic ND filter will be implemented in all the Z CAM E2 flagship models – Z CAM E2 S6, F6, and F8 – with EF-mount or PL-mount. The only exception is the Z CAM E2 S6 with the Micro four thirds mount. The electronic ND unit will not be available for this mount simply because of the much shorter flange focal distance.
Pricing and Availability
The new Z CAM E2 flagship cameras are now available for pre-order. They will be available on October 2019. I would say the price is very interesting given the number of features and impressive specs:
E2-S6 (6K super 35): $2,995 – available in PL, EF and M4/3 mount.
E2-F6 (6K full frame): $4,995 – available in PL or EF-mount.
E2-F8 (8K full frame): $5,995 – available in PL or EF-mount.
The exact pricing for the electronic ND filter unit has not been finalized yet, but Kinson assured us it will be affordable.
What do you think about the new Z CAM E2 F6? Do you miss the internal electronic ND filter with your current camera? Do you have experience with the original Z CAM E2? Let us know in the comments underneath the article.
Cartoni is introducing two new professional grade tripod fluid heads at IBC 2019, the Cartoni Maxima 5.0 and the Cartoni Master 25, aimed at the cinema and broadcast communities respectively.
The tripod heads shown here somewhat continue the theme of Cartoni competing with other manufacturers directly, by trying to out-innovate rather than out-spec them.
Maxima 5.0 is the next step in the evolution of Cartoni’s Maxima series, following its predecessors the Maxima 40 (payload of ~ 40 kg) and 30 (~ 30 kg) and it’s improving on those quite a bit.
The Cartoni Maxima 5.0 can handle payloads of up to 50 kg (110.2 lbs), weighing in at only 13 kg (28.6 lbs) itself. It will handle that payload throughout its +90 and -90° tilt range. The Cartoni Maxima 5.0 has a Mitchell mount, but can be adapted to use a bowl head. The sliding plate is compatible with ARRI, Sony and O’Connor. The Cartoni Maxima 5.0 features Cartoni’s patented counterbalance, which can be dialed in precisely and repeatably with the display on the head’s operator side. Additionally, there is a locking mechanism, that will prevent the head from shifting with the flick of one lever only.
As Elisabetta Cartoni mentions in our interview, this new entry into the Maxima series is set to compete directly with the very popular O’Connor 2575 fluid head, which has become somewhat of a favorite among filmmakers using larger setups with long lenses. The Cartoni Maxima 5.0, however, is supposed to be even more precise and optimized for these use cases than the O’Connor head. We didn’t yet have the chance to compare the two, but we hope to do so at some point in the future.
The Master 25 is Cartoni’s premium allround fluid head, which is priced competitively (within its segment). It’s aiming at the broadcast and independent communities alike.
The Cartoni Master 25 features continuous counterbalance and fluid drag, a 150mm bowl and a tilt range of +90 and -90°. The payload capacity ranges from 3 kg (7 lbs) to 30 kg (66 lbs), with the head weighing in at 4.4 kg (9.7 lbs).
According to Elisabetta Cartoni, a company that also works for NASA has aided Cartoni in the R&D of this head, developing a new fluid that has absolutely no elasticity and no stiction in neither takeoff nor stops. According to Cartoni, the head has already found great appreciation among users.
Pricing and availability
The Cartoni Maxima 5.0 and Cartoni Master 25 are both available and in stock right now, with the Maxima coming in at around € 8.000 and the Master 25 at around € 6.000.
What do you think about Cartoni’s new fluid heads? Are these heads you might want to use in your productions? Let us know in the comments!
Earlier this month, Laowa teased their new 1.4x full-frame expander and 1.33x rear anamorphic adapters explicitly designed for the much anticipated Laowa OOOM 25-100mm T/2.9 Cine Zoom lens. During IBC 2019, we met with Laowa to take a quick look at these new adapters and get an update about the Laowa OOOM.
We already reported a few times about the Laowa OOOM 25-100mm T/2.9 Cine Zoom lens. As a quick reminder, this lens covers Super35 sensors, it features a constant T/2.9 aperture (with nine aperture blades), and a generous four times zoom.
As the Laowa OOOM is a Cine Zoom lens, the aperture, zoom, and focus ring have standard 0.8 mod/32 pitch gears. That way, you can easily use a manual or motorized FIZ system to take control of your lens. The focus barrel has a rotation of 270 degrees. The Laowa OOOM 25-100mm T/2.9 Cine Zoom lens will be available in either PL and Canon EF mount.
At IBC 2019, we had a chance to talk with Kevin from Laowa about this much anticipated Cine Zoom lens and get an update. In the previous prototype, the Cine Zoom was heavy at around 2.6kg, but they are now trying to improve the lens design to make it lighter. Also, there is now a new switch on the lens. If you press it, you can rotate the aperture and focal length marks. This switch is specially designed to see the correct aperture and focal length readings if you are using the OOOM lens with the Laowa 1.4x expander adapter.
Laowa 1.4x Full-Frame Expander Adapter
We were able to get a first look at the new Laowa 1.4x full-frame expander adapter. This rear adapter is made specifically for the Laowa OOOM Cine Zoom lens, but it should also be compatible with other lenses. This full-frame expander adapter allows you to expand the Super35 image circle of a lens so it can cover a full-frame sensor.
With the Laowa 1.4x full-frame expander adapter you get a focal length multiplier of 1.4x, and you also lose one stop of light. If you pair it with the Laowa OOOM Cine Zoom lens, the focal lengths will transform from 25-100mm to 35-140mm with a constant T/4.0 aperture. This is why the new “switch” button on the glass is useful.
Another interesting rear adapter is the Laowa 1.33x anamorphic adapter. This rear anamorphic adapter is different from a more “traditional” front anamorphic adapter like the ones from SLR Magic for example. With the Laowa rear anamorphic adapter, you will get less “streak” lens flares, and the bokeh will also be less oval-shaped. Also, there will be a half stop light loss when using it.
This anamorphic adapter is made specifically for the Laowa OOOM 25-100mm T/2.9 Cine Zoom lens, but it can be, in theory, be used with every glass. The unit you can see is a PL to PL adapter, but Laowa also plans to release a Canon EF to the Canon EF version.
Pricing and Availability
The Laowa OOOM 25-100mm T/2.9 Cine Zoom lens should be available before the end of this year for around $6500.00. The two Laowa adapters are still very early prototypes, but they should “cost no more than a few hundred dollars” according to Laowa. They should be available next year.
What do you think of the Laowa OOOM 25-100mm T/2.9 Cine Zoom lens? Do you believe rear adapters are an excellent option to make a lens more versatile? Let us know in the comments!
Photographer Nigel Danson recently asked his 50,000+ followers on Instagram — most of which are outdoor and landscape photographers — what they think the hardest part of photography is. After getting back 1,827 responses, Danson made this 20-minute video to share the responses.
Here’s a breakdown of the 7 hardest things along with videos Danson has made that addresses them:
3. Location Planning
4. Woodland Photography
5. Time and Motivation
6. Boring Locations
This one didn’t have a prior video, but Danson does offer tips while discussing this challenge.
Watch the full 20-minute video at the top to hear Danson step through each of these challenges and offer his thoughts and solutions on them.